By Alexander Sanger

November 8, 2013

Virginia and New Jersey have spoken – the former electing a pro-choice governor and the latter an anti. Did Choice matter? Did Women matter?

Abortion was considered the third most important issue by Virginia voters, with the economy and health care coverage outweighing it.

The Virginia electorate’s views on abortion rights almost exactly mirror the national opinion.

The 2012 national election and 2013 Virginia election exit poll breakdown are as follows, when the voters were asked if abortion should be:

                                    National 2012             Virginia 2013

Legal in all cases         29%                            27%

Legal in most cases     30%                            33%

Illegal in most cases    23%                            23%

Illegal in all cases        13%                            11%

Voters nationally and in Virginia generally vote for the candidate that supports their view, with the exception of the “Legal in most cases” group, which tends to have a greater percentage voting for the anti-choice candidate than the “Illegal in most cases” group has voting for the pro-choice candidate.

                                                Obama            Romney                      McAuliffe       Cuccinelli

Legal in most cases                 58%                40%                            59%                30%

Illegal in most cases                22%                76%                            17%                80%

In other words there is a 20-percentage point difference in voting patterns in these categories. The pro-choice candidates, Obama and McAuliffe, got 58% and 59% respectively of the ‘legal in most cases’voter, while Romney and Cuccinelli got 76% and 80% of the ‘illegal in most cases’ voter.

This pattern is similar to the abortion gap in 2012. Romney got 29% of the vote of people who thought abortion should be legal, whereas Obama got only 21% of the vote of people who thought abortion should be illegal.

This is a pattern that has been seen repeatedly in national and state elections. The mostly pro-choice voter votes other issues more than choice, whereas the mostly anti-choice voter does not. That said, the raw numbers still favor by a slight margin the pro-choice candidate, since the pool of voters in the ‘legal in most cases’ camp is larger by 7-10 percentage points than the ‘illegal in most cases’ voters.

There was the usual gender gap in Virginia, with men supporting Cuccinelli 48 to 45 and women supporting McAuliffe 51 to 42 for a 12-point gap, virtually identical to the 2012 Virginia gender gap for Obama of 13 points. The national gap gender for Obama in 2012 was 18 points, hence Virginia trails the national average.

54% of white women voted for Cuccinelli, as did 51% of married women. Women are not monolithic, to say the least, in their support of pro-choice candidates or Democrats.

A greater voting gap was the married-unmarried gap,

In 2012, marrieds went for Romney 56-42. Unmarrieds went for Obama 62-35, for a 41-point marriage gap.

In Virginia in 2013, marrieds went for Cuccinelli 50-43 and Unmarrieds for McAuliffe 62-29, for a 40-point marriage gap, virtually identical to the national marriage gap.

In New Jersey, every group went for the popular anti-choice, anti-family planning incumbent, with 63% of men and 57% of women voting for Christie. Abortion rights was not a major issue in the campaign, not registering on the exit polls.

The messages from these campaigns include the non-monolithic character of women voters and choice voters. Issues other than choice, and even family planning, are not the primary determinants of many women voters. The gender gap is real, but the marriage, income and race gaps are greater. Politicians have yet to make the compelling case that reproductive freedom is essential for women, and men, and that they should vote accordingly. The connections to issues perceived as of greater importance, like the economy, taxes and health care coverage, need to be made. Healthy families with planned and spaced children of one’s choosing lead to increased women’s participation in the economy, more productivity, and less health care expenditures and taxes. This is a message equally compelling to marrieds as unmarrieds, but so far only the latter group have gotten the message and vote accordingly, as they want to keep their life options open.